Reliability and Robustness analysis of Machine Learning based Phishing URL Detectors
This work addresses security vulnerabilities in phishing detection systems, which are critical for protecting users and organizations from attacks, but it is incremental as it focuses on testing existing models rather than proposing new defenses.
The authors tackled the problem of assessing the reliability and robustness of machine learning-based phishing URL detectors by testing 50 state-of-the-art models against adversarial URLs, finding that the models' median Matthew Correlation Coefficient dropped from 0.92 to 0.02, indicating they are unreliable in their current form.
ML-based Phishing URL (MLPU) detectors serve as the first level of defence to protect users and organisations from being victims of phishing attacks. Lately, few studies have launched successful adversarial attacks against specific MLPU detectors raising questions about their practical reliability and usage. Nevertheless, the robustness of these systems has not been extensively investigated. Therefore, the security vulnerabilities of these systems, in general, remain primarily unknown which calls for testing the robustness of these systems. In this article, we have proposed a methodology to investigate the reliability and robustness of 50 representative state-of-the-art MLPU models. Firstly, we have proposed a cost-effective Adversarial URL generator URLBUG that created an Adversarial URL dataset. Subsequently, we reproduced 50 MLPU (traditional ML and Deep learning) systems and recorded their baseline performance. Lastly, we tested the considered MLPU systems on Adversarial Dataset and analyzed their robustness and reliability using box plots and heat maps. Our results showed that the generated adversarial URLs have valid syntax and can be registered at a median annual price of \$11.99. Out of 13\% of the already registered adversarial URLs, 63.94\% were used for malicious purposes. Moreover, the considered MLPU models Matthew Correlation Coefficient (MCC) dropped from a median 0.92 to 0.02 when tested against $Adv_\mathrm{data}$, indicating that the baseline MLPU models are unreliable in their current form. Further, our findings identified several security vulnerabilities of these systems and provided future directions for researchers to design dependable and secure MLPU systems.