Nayoung Kim

Lu Cheng, Nayoung Kim, Huan Liu

Debiasing word embeddings has been largely limited to individual and independent social categories. However, real-world corpora typically present multiple social categories that possibly correlate or intersect with each other. For instance, "hair weaves" is stereotypically associated with African American females, but neither African American nor females alone. Therefore, this work studies biases associated with multiple social categories: joint biases induced by the union of different categories and intersectional biases that do not overlap with the biases of the constituent categories. We first empirically observe that individual biases intersect non-trivially (i.e., over a one-dimensional subspace). Drawing from the intersectional theory in social science and the linguistic theory, we then construct an intersectional subspace to debias for multiple social categories using the nonlinear geometry of individual biases. Empirical evaluations corroborate the efficacy of our approach. Data and implementation code can be downloaded at https://github.com/GitHubLuCheng/Implementation-of-JoSEC-COLING-22.

Nayoung Kim, David Mosallanezhad, Lu Cheng et al.

The abundance of social media data has presented opportunities for accurately determining public and group-specific stances around policy proposals or controversial topics. In contrast with sentiment analysis which focuses on identifying prevailing emotions, stance detection identifies precise positions (i.e., supportive, opposing, neutral) relative to a well-defined topic, such as perceptions toward specific global health interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Traditional stance detection models, while effective within their specific domain (e.g., attitudes towards masking protocols during COVID-19), often lag in performance when applied to new domains and topics due to changes in data distribution. This limitation is compounded by the scarcity of domain-specific, labeled datasets, which are expensive and labor-intensive to create. A solution we present in this paper combines counterfactual data augmentation with contrastive learning to enhance the robustness of stance detection across domains and topics of interest. We evaluate the performance of current state-of-the-art stance detection models, including a prompt-optimized large language model, relative to our proposed framework succinctly called STANCE-C3 (domain-adaptive Cross-target STANCE detection via Contrastive learning and Counterfactual generation). Empirical evaluations demonstrate STANCE-C3's consistent improvements over the baseline models with respect to accuracy across domains and varying focal topics. Despite the increasing prevalence of general-purpose models such as generative AI, specialized models such as STANCE-C3 provide utility in safety-critical domains wherein precision is highly valued, especially when a nuanced understanding of the concerns of different population segments could result in crafting more impactful public policies.

Myke C. Cohen, Nayoung Kim, Yang Ba et al.

Despite an extensive body of literature on trust in technology, designing trustworthy AI systems for high-stakes decision domains remains a significant challenge, further compounded by the lack of actionable design and evaluation tools. The Multisource AI Scorecard Table (MAST) was designed to bridge this gap by offering a systematic, tradecraft-centered approach to evaluating AI-enabled decision support systems. Expanding on MAST, we introduce an iterative design framework called \textit{Principles-based Approach for Designing Trustworthy, Human-centered AI using MAST Methodology} (PADTHAI-MM). We demonstrate this framework in our development of the Reporting Assistant for Defense and Intelligence Tasks (READIT), a research platform that leverages data visualizations and natural language processing-based text analysis, emulating an AI-enabled system supporting intelligence reporting work. To empirically assess the efficacy of MAST on trust in AI, we developed two distinct iterations of READIT for comparison: a High-MAST version, which incorporates AI contextual information and explanations, and a Low-MAST version, akin to a ``black box'' system. This iterative design process, guided by stakeholder feedback and contemporary AI architectures, culminated in a prototype that was evaluated through its use in an intelligence reporting task. We further discuss the potential benefits of employing the MAST-inspired design framework to address context-specific needs. We also explore the relationship between stakeholder evaluators' MAST ratings and three categories of information known to impact trust: \textit{process}, \textit{purpose}, and \textit{performance}. Overall, our study supports the practical benefits and theoretical validity for PADTHAI-MM as a viable method for designing trustable, context-specific AI systems.