Ruiqi Chen

h-index14
2papers
785citations

2 Papers

11.1CRMar 6
SemFuzz: A Semantics-Aware Fuzzing Framework for Network Protocol Implementations

Yanbang Sun, Quan Luo, Yuelin Wang et al.

Network protocols are the foundation of modern communication, yet their implementations often contain semantic vulnerabilities stemming from inadequate understanding of specification semantics. Existing gray-box and black-box testing approaches lack semantic modeling of protocols, making it difficult to precisely express testing intent and cover boundary conditions. Moreover, they typically rely on coarse-grained oracles such as crashes, which are inadequate for identifying deep semantic vulnerabilities. To address these limitations, we present a semantics-aware fuzzing framework, SemFuzz. The framework leverages large language models to extract structured semantic rules from RFC documents and generates test cases that intentionally violate these rules to encode specific testing intents. It then detects deep semantic vulnerabilities by comparing the observed responses with the expected ones. Evaluation on seven widely deployed protocol implementations shows that SemFuzz identified sixteen potential vulnerabilities, ten of which have been confirmed. Among the confirmed vulnerabilities, five were previously unknown and four have been assigned CVEs. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of SemFuzz in detecting semantic vulnerabilities.

3.7HCFeb 8, 2021
Observers Pupillary Responses in Recognising Real and Posed Smiles: A Preliminary Study

Ruiqi Chen, Atiqul Islam, Tom Gedeon et al.

Pupillary responses (PR) change differently for different types of stimuli. This study aims to check whether observers PR can recognise real and posed smiles from a set of smile images and videos. We showed the smile images and smile videos stimuli to observers, and recorded their pupillary responses considering four different situations, namely paired videos, paired images, single videos, and single images. When the same smiler was viewed by observers in both real and posed smile forms, we refer them as paired; otherwise we use the term single. The primary analysis on pupil data revealed that the differences of pupillary response between real and posed smiles are more significant in case of paired videos compared to others. This result is found from timeline analysis, KS-test, and ANOVA test. Overall, our model can recognise real and posed smiles from observers pupillary responses instead of smilers responses. Our research will be applicable in affective computing and computer-human interaction for measuring emotional authenticity.