Zhu Zhuo

Zhitao Zeng, Mengya Xu, Jian Jiang et al.

Surgical intelligence has the potential to improve the safety and consistency of surgical care, yet most existing surgical AI frameworks remain task-specific and struggle to generalize across procedures and institutions. Although multimodal foundation models, particularly multimodal large language models, have demonstrated strong cross-task capabilities across various medical domains, their advancement in surgery remains constrained by the lack of large-scale, systematically curated multimodal data. To address this challenge, we introduce Surg$Σ$, a spectrum of large-scale multimodal data and foundation models for surgical intelligence. At the core of this framework lies Surg$Σ$-DB, a large-scale multimodal data foundation designed to support diverse surgical tasks. Surg$Σ$-DB consolidates heterogeneous surgical data sources (including open-source datasets, curated in-house clinical collections and web-source data) into a unified schema, aiming to improve label consistency and data standardization across heterogeneous datasets. Surg$Σ$-DB spans 6 clinical specialties and diverse surgical types, providing rich image- and video-level annotations across 18 practical surgical tasks covering understanding, reasoning, planning, and generation, at an unprecedented scale (over 5.98M conversations). Beyond conventional multimodal conversations, Surg$Σ$-DB incorporates hierarchical reasoning annotations, providing richer semantic cues to support deeper contextual understanding in complex surgical scenarios. We further provide empirical evidence through recently developed surgical foundation models built upon Surg$Σ$-DB, illustrating the practical benefits of large-scale multimodal annotations, unified semantic design, and structured reasoning annotations for improving cross-task generalization and interpretability.

Zheng Fang, Ziwei Niu, Ziyue Wang et al.

Surgical scene Multi-Task Federated Learning (MTFL) is essential for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RAS) but remains underexplored in surgical video understanding due to two key challenges: (1) Tissue Diversity: Local models struggle to adapt to site-specific tissue features, limiting their effectiveness in heterogeneous clinical environments and leading to poor local predictions. (2) Task Diversity: Server-side aggregation, relying solely on gradient-based clustering, often produces suboptimal or incorrect parameter updates due to inter-site task heterogeneity, resulting in inaccurate localization. In light of these two issues, we propose SurgFed, a multi-task federated learning framework, enabling federated learning for surgical scene segmentation and depth estimation across diverse surgical types. SurgFed is powered by two appealing designs, i.e., Language-guided Channel Selection (LCS) and Language-guided Hyper Aggregation (LHA), to address the challenge of fully exploration on corss-site and cross-task. Technically, the LCS is first designed a lightweight personalized channel selection network that enhances site-specific adaptation using pre-defined text inputs, which optimally the local model learn the specific embeddings. We further introduce the LHA that employs a layer-wise cross-attention mechanism with pre-defined text inputs to model task interactions across sites and guide a hypernetwork for personalized parameter updates. Extensive empirical evidence shows that SurgFed yields improvements over the state-of-the-art methods in five public datasets across four surgical types. The code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/SurgFed-070E/.

Guanyi Qin, Xiaozhen Wang, Zhu Zhuo et al.

Minimally invasive surgery has dramatically improved patient operative outcomes, yet identifying safe operative zones remains challenging in critical phases, requiring surgeons to integrate visual cues, procedural phase, and anatomical context under high cognitive load. Existing AI systems offer binary safety verification or static detection, ignoring the phase-dependent nature of intraoperative reasoning. We introduce ResGo, a benchmark of laparoscopic frames annotated with Go Zone bounding boxes and clinician-authored rationales covering phase, exposure quality reasoning, next action and risk reminder. We introduce evaluation metrics that treat correct grounding under incorrect phase as failures, revealing that most vision-language models cannot handle such tasks and perform poorly. We then present SurGo-R1, a model optimized via RLHF with a multi-turn phase-then-go architecture where the model first identifies the surgical phase, then generates reasoning and Go Zone coordinates conditioned on that context. On unseen procedures, SurGo-R1 achieves 76.6% phase accuracy, 32.7 mIoU, and 54.8% hardcore accuracy, a 6.6$\times$ improvement over the mainstream generalist VLMs. Code, model and benchmark will be available at https://github.com/jinlab-imvr/SurGo-R1

Jian Jiang, Chenxi Lin, Yiming Gu et al.

Surgical scene understanding demands not only accurate predictions but also interpretable reasoning that surgeons can verify against clinical expertise. However, existing surgical vision-language models generate predictions without reasoning chains, and general-purpose reasoning models fail on compositional surgical tasks without domain-specific knowledge. We present Surg-R1, a surgical Vision-Language Model that addresses this gap through hierarchical reasoning trained via a four-stage pipeline. Our approach introduces three key contributions: (1) a three-level reasoning hierarchy decomposing surgical interpretation into perceptual grounding, relational understanding, and contextual reasoning; (2) the largest surgical chain-of-thought dataset with 320,000 reasoning pairs; and (3) a four-stage training pipeline progressing from supervised fine-tuning to group relative policy optimization and iterative self-improvement. Evaluation on SurgBench, comprising six public benchmarks and six multi-center external validation datasets from five institutions, demonstrates that Surg-R1 achieves the highest Arena Score (64.9%) on public benchmarks versus Gemini 3.0 Pro (46.1%) and GPT-5.1 (37.9%), outperforming both proprietary reasoning models and specialized surgical VLMs on the majority of tasks spanning instrument localization, triplet recognition, phase recognition, action recognition, and critical view of safety assessment, with a 15.2 percentage point improvement over the strongest surgical baseline on external validation.