Surg-R1: A Hierarchical Reasoning Foundation Model for Scalable and Interpretable Surgical Decision Support with Multi-Center Clinical Validation
This addresses the need for interpretable surgical decision support for surgeons, representing a novel method for a known bottleneck rather than an incremental improvement.
The paper tackles the problem of surgical scene understanding requiring interpretable reasoning by introducing Surg-R1, a surgical vision-language model with hierarchical reasoning, which achieves a 64.9% Arena Score on public benchmarks and a 15.2 percentage point improvement over the strongest surgical baseline on external validation.
Surgical scene understanding demands not only accurate predictions but also interpretable reasoning that surgeons can verify against clinical expertise. However, existing surgical vision-language models generate predictions without reasoning chains, and general-purpose reasoning models fail on compositional surgical tasks without domain-specific knowledge. We present Surg-R1, a surgical Vision-Language Model that addresses this gap through hierarchical reasoning trained via a four-stage pipeline. Our approach introduces three key contributions: (1) a three-level reasoning hierarchy decomposing surgical interpretation into perceptual grounding, relational understanding, and contextual reasoning; (2) the largest surgical chain-of-thought dataset with 320,000 reasoning pairs; and (3) a four-stage training pipeline progressing from supervised fine-tuning to group relative policy optimization and iterative self-improvement. Evaluation on SurgBench, comprising six public benchmarks and six multi-center external validation datasets from five institutions, demonstrates that Surg-R1 achieves the highest Arena Score (64.9%) on public benchmarks versus Gemini 3.0 Pro (46.1%) and GPT-5.1 (37.9%), outperforming both proprietary reasoning models and specialized surgical VLMs on the majority of tasks spanning instrument localization, triplet recognition, phase recognition, action recognition, and critical view of safety assessment, with a 15.2 percentage point improvement over the strongest surgical baseline on external validation.