MELGSTMLJul 25, 2012

Equivalence of distance-based and RKHS-based statistics in hypothesis testing

arXiv:1207.6076v3786 citations
AI Analysis

This work provides a theoretical bridge between statistical and machine learning methods for two-sample and independence testing, potentially enhancing test power in applications like data analysis and model validation.

The paper establishes a unifying equivalence between distance-based statistics (energy distances, distance covariances) and RKHS-based statistics (maximum mean discrepancies) for hypothesis testing, showing they correspond exactly under certain conditions, and demonstrates that alternative choices within this framework can yield more powerful tests.

We provide a unifying framework linking two classes of statistics used in two-sample and independence testing: on the one hand, the energy distances and distance covariances from the statistics literature; on the other, maximum mean discrepancies (MMD), that is, distances between embeddings of distributions to reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS), as established in machine learning. In the case where the energy distance is computed with a semimetric of negative type, a positive definite kernel, termed distance kernel, may be defined such that the MMD corresponds exactly to the energy distance. Conversely, for any positive definite kernel, we can interpret the MMD as energy distance with respect to some negative-type semimetric. This equivalence readily extends to distance covariance using kernels on the product space. We determine the class of probability distributions for which the test statistics are consistent against all alternatives. Finally, we investigate the performance of the family of distance kernels in two-sample and independence tests: we show in particular that the energy distance most commonly employed in statistics is just one member of a parametric family of kernels, and that other choices from this family can yield more powerful tests.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes