Quantitative Evaluation of Performance and Validity Indices for Clustering the Web Navigational Sessions
This work addresses the need for reliable clustering evaluation in web usage mining, but it is incremental as it applies existing methods to a specific domain without introducing new techniques.
The paper evaluated the performance of several clustering algorithms on web navigational session data, comparing their accuracy, validity, and time efficiency using various indices, with results showing differences in effectiveness among methods like k-Means and DBSCAN.
Clustering techniques are widely used in Web Usage Mining to capture similar interests and trends among users accessing a Web site. For this purpose, web access logs generated at a particular web site are preprocessed to discover the user navigational sessions. Clustering techniques are then applied to group the user session data into user session clusters, where intercluster similarities are minimized while the intra cluster similarities are maximized. Since the application of different clustering algorithms generally results in different sets of cluster formation, it is important to evaluate the performance of these methods in terms of accuracy and validity of the clusters, and also the time required to generate them, using appropriate performance measures. This paper describes various validity and accuracy measures including Dunn's Index, Davies Bouldin Index, C Index, Rand Index, Jaccard Index, Silhouette Index, Fowlkes Mallows and Sum of the Squared Error (SSE). We conducted the performance evaluation of the following clustering techniques: k-Means, k-Medoids, Leader, Single Link Agglomerative Hierarchical and DBSCAN. These techniques are implemented and tested against the Web user navigational data. Finally their performance results are presented and compared.