LGFeb 7, 2017

Empirical Risk Minimization for Stochastic Convex Optimization: $O(1/n)$- and $O(1/n^2)$-type of Risk Bounds

arXiv:1702.02030v152 citations
Originality Highly original
AI Analysis

This work provides stronger theoretical guarantees for ERM in SCO, which is important for researchers in optimization and machine learning, though it is incremental in building on existing ERM theories.

The paper tackles the problem of improving risk bounds for empirical risk minimization (ERM) in stochastic convex optimization (SCO) by exploiting smoothness and strong convexity, establishing new bounds such as $\widetilde{O}(d/n + \sqrt{F_*/n})$ and $O(1/[λn^2] + κF_*/n)$, with the latter being the first $O(1/n^2)$-type bound for ERM.

Although there exist plentiful theories of empirical risk minimization (ERM) for supervised learning, current theoretical understandings of ERM for a related problem---stochastic convex optimization (SCO), are limited. In this work, we strengthen the realm of ERM for SCO by exploiting smoothness and strong convexity conditions to improve the risk bounds. First, we establish an $\widetilde{O}(d/n + \sqrt{F_*/n})$ risk bound when the random function is nonnegative, convex and smooth, and the expected function is Lipschitz continuous, where $d$ is the dimensionality of the problem, $n$ is the number of samples, and $F_*$ is the minimal risk. Thus, when $F_*$ is small we obtain an $\widetilde{O}(d/n)$ risk bound, which is analogous to the $\widetilde{O}(1/n)$ optimistic rate of ERM for supervised learning. Second, if the objective function is also $λ$-strongly convex, we prove an $\widetilde{O}(d/n + κF_*/n )$ risk bound where $κ$ is the condition number, and improve it to $O(1/[λn^2] + κF_*/n)$ when $n=\widetildeΩ(κd)$. As a result, we obtain an $O(κ/n^2)$ risk bound under the condition that $n$ is large and $F_*$ is small, which to the best of our knowledge, is the first $O(1/n^2)$-type of risk bound of ERM. Third, we stress that the above results are established in a unified framework, which allows us to derive new risk bounds under weaker conditions, e.g., without convexity of the random function and Lipschitz continuity of the expected function. Finally, we demonstrate that to achieve an $O(1/[λn^2] + κF_*/n)$ risk bound for supervised learning, the $\widetildeΩ(κd)$ requirement on $n$ can be replaced with $Ω(κ^2)$, which is dimensionality-independent.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes