LGAIMLFeb 18, 2017

Quadratic Upper Bound for Recursive Teaching Dimension of Finite VC Classes

arXiv:1702.05677v118 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses a theoretical problem in computational learning theory, providing a significant step towards resolving a known open question, though it is incremental as it does not fully solve the problem.

The paper tackles the open problem of whether the recursive teaching dimension (RTD) is linearly upper bounded by the VC dimension (VCD) for finite concept classes, showing a quadratic upper bound of O(d^2), which improves upon the previous exponential bound of O(d * 2^d).

In this work we study the quantitative relation between the recursive teaching dimension (RTD) and the VC dimension (VCD) of concept classes of finite sizes. The RTD of a concept class $\mathcal C \subseteq \{0, 1\}^n$, introduced by Zilles et al. (2011), is a combinatorial complexity measure characterized by the worst-case number of examples necessary to identify a concept in $\mathcal C$ according to the recursive teaching model. For any finite concept class $\mathcal C \subseteq \{0,1\}^n$ with $\mathrm{VCD}(\mathcal C)=d$, Simon & Zilles (2015) posed an open problem $\mathrm{RTD}(\mathcal C) = O(d)$, i.e., is RTD linearly upper bounded by VCD? Previously, the best known result is an exponential upper bound $\mathrm{RTD}(\mathcal C) = O(d \cdot 2^d)$, due to Chen et al. (2016). In this paper, we show a quadratic upper bound: $\mathrm{RTD}(\mathcal C) = O(d^2)$, much closer to an answer to the open problem. We also discuss the challenges in fully solving the problem.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes