CELGMay 2, 2018

Utilizing Device-level Demand Forecasting for Flexibility Markets - Full Version

arXiv:1805.00702v112 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses financial challenges for energy market players in the Danish/Nordic market by enabling flexibility-based demand response, though it is incremental as it builds on existing forecasting models.

The paper tackles the problem of power supply uncertainty from renewable energy by proposing a device-level demand response scheme to minimize market imbalances, achieving regulation cost savings of 54% of the theoretically optimal even with low forecast accuracy.

The uncertainty in the power supply due to fluctuating Renewable Energy Sources (RES) has severe (financial and other) implications for energy market players. In this paper, we present a device-level Demand Response (DR) scheme that captures the atomic (all available) flexibilities in energy demand and provides the largest possible solution space to generate demand/supply schedules that minimize market imbalances. We evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of widely used forecasting models for device-level flexibility analysis. In a typical device-level flexibility forecast, a market player is more concerned with the \textit{utility} that the demand flexibility brings to the market, rather than the intrinsic forecast accuracy. In this regard, we provide comprehensive predictive modeling and scheduling of demand flexibility from household appliances to demonstrate the (financial and otherwise) viability of introducing flexibility-based DR in the Danish/Nordic market. Further, we investigate the correlation between the potential utility and the accuracy of the demand forecast model. Furthermore, we perform a number of experiments to determine the data granularity that provides the best financial reward to market players for adopting the proposed DR scheme. A cost-benefit analysis of forecast results shows that even with somewhat low forecast accuracy, market players can achieve regulation cost savings of 54% of the theoretically optimal.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes