An Algorithm for Learning Shape and Appearance Models without Annotations
This enables privacy-preserving medical image analysis by allowing shared basis functions while keeping individual image data secure, though it appears incremental as it builds on existing EM-like frameworks.
The paper tackles the problem of learning shape and appearance models without manual annotations by proposing an iterative framework based on a probabilistic generative model, which is demonstrated to align images on datasets like KDEF and classify patient groups on over 1,900 brain MR images.
This paper presents a framework for automatically learning shape and appearance models for medical (and certain other) images. It is based on the idea that having a more accurate shape and appearance model leads to more accurate image registration, which in turn leads to a more accurate shape and appearance model. This leads naturally to an iterative scheme, which is based on a probabilistic generative model that is fit using Gauss-Newton updates within an EM-like framework. It was developed with the aim of enabling distributed privacy-preserving analysis of brain image data, such that shared information (shape and appearance basis functions) may be passed across sites, whereas latent variables that encode individual images remain secure within each site. These latent variables are proposed as features for privacy-preserving data mining applications. The approach is demonstrated qualitatively on the KDEF dataset of 2D face images, showing that it can align images that traditionally require shape and appearance models trained using manually annotated data (manually defined landmarks etc.). It is applied to MNIST dataset of handwritten digits to show its potential for machine learning applications, particularly when training data is limited. The model is able to handle ``missing data'', which allows it to be cross-validated according to how well it can predict left-out voxels. The suitability of the derived features for classifying individuals into patient groups was assessed by applying it to a dataset of over 1,900 segmented T1-weighted MR images, which included images from the COBRE and ABIDE datasets.