Singularity, Misspecification, and the Convergence Rate of EM
This addresses the problem of slow convergence in misspecified statistical models for researchers in machine learning and statistics, providing a sharp theoretical analysis of EM behavior in singular settings.
The paper tackles the convergence rate of the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm in over-specified Gaussian mixture models, revealing that convergence is geometric with accuracy O((d/n)^{1/2}) for unbalanced weights but exponentially slower with accuracy O((d/n)^{1/4}) for balanced weights.
A line of recent work has analyzed the behavior of the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm in the well-specified setting, in which the population likelihood is locally strongly concave around its maximizing argument. Examples include suitably separated Gaussian mixture models and mixtures of linear regressions. We consider over-specified settings in which the number of fitted components is larger than the number of components in the true distribution. Such misspecified settings can lead to singularity in the Fisher information matrix, and moreover, the maximum likelihood estimator based on $n$ i.i.d. samples in $d$ dimensions can have a non-standard $\mathcal{O}((d/n)^{\frac{1}{4}})$ rate of convergence. Focusing on the simple setting of two-component mixtures fit to a $d$-dimensional Gaussian distribution, we study the behavior of the EM algorithm both when the mixture weights are different (unbalanced case), and are equal (balanced case). Our analysis reveals a sharp distinction between these two cases: in the former, the EM algorithm converges geometrically to a point at Euclidean distance of $\mathcal{O}((d/n)^{\frac{1}{2}})$ from the true parameter, whereas in the latter case, the convergence rate is exponentially slower, and the fixed point has a much lower $\mathcal{O}((d/n)^{\frac{1}{4}})$ accuracy. Analysis of this singular case requires the introduction of some novel techniques: in particular, we make use of a careful form of localization in the associated empirical process, and develop a recursive argument to progressively sharpen the statistical rate.