IVCVSep 26, 2019

Subjective and Objective De-raining Quality Assessment Towards Authentic Rain Image

arXiv:1909.11983v370 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the problem of evaluating de-raining algorithms for researchers and developers, though it is incremental as it builds on existing quality assessment methods.

The paper tackles the lack of quality assessment for de-rained images by creating a database of 206 authentic rain images and their de-rained versions, and proposes a bi-directional feature embedding network (B-FEN) that significantly outperforms existing models in measuring quality.

Images acquired by outdoor vision systems easily suffer poor visibility and annoying interference due to the rainy weather, which brings great challenge for accurately understanding and describing the visual contents. Recent researches have devoted great efforts on the task of rain removal for improving the image visibility. However, there is very few exploration about the quality assessment of de-rained image, even it is crucial for accurately measuring the performance of various de-raining algorithms. In this paper, we first create a de-raining quality assessment (DQA) database that collects 206 authentic rain images and their de-rained versions produced by 6 representative single image rain removal algorithms. Then, a subjective study is conducted on our DQA database, which collects the subject-rated scores of all de-rained images. To quantitatively measure the quality of de-rained image with non-uniform artifacts, we propose a bi-directional feature embedding network (B-FEN) which integrates the features of global perception and local difference together. Experiments confirm that the proposed method significantly outperforms many existing universal blind image quality assessment models. To help the research towards perceptually preferred de-raining algorithm, we will publicly release our DQA database and B-FEN source code on https://github.com/wqb-uestc.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes