CVLGMLDec 25, 2019

SketchTransfer: A Challenging New Task for Exploring Detail-Invariance and the Abstractions Learned by Deep Networks

arXiv:1912.11570v12 citations
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This work addresses a gap in generalization between human and machine learning abilities, specifically for detail-invariance in perceptual tasks, but it is incremental as it introduces a new dataset and benchmark without a novel method.

The paper tackles the problem of deep networks' lack of detail-invariance, where they struggle to generalize to variations like missing details in sketches, by proposing the SketchTransfer dataset and task. The result shows that state-of-the-art domain transfer algorithms achieve only 59% accuracy on SketchTransfer, compared to 87% for a classifier trained directly on sketches, indicating significant room for improvement.

Deep networks have achieved excellent results in perceptual tasks, yet their ability to generalize to variations not seen during training has come under increasing scrutiny. In this work we focus on their ability to have invariance towards the presence or absence of details. For example, humans are able to watch cartoons, which are missing many visual details, without being explicitly trained to do so. As another example, 3D rendering software is a relatively recent development, yet people are able to understand such rendered scenes even though they are missing details (consider a film like Toy Story). The failure of machine learning algorithms to do this indicates a significant gap in generalization between human abilities and the abilities of deep networks. We propose a dataset that will make it easier to study the detail-invariance problem concretely. We produce a concrete task for this: SketchTransfer, and we show that state-of-the-art domain transfer algorithms still struggle with this task. The state-of-the-art technique which achieves over 95\% on MNIST $\xrightarrow{}$ SVHN transfer only achieves 59\% accuracy on the SketchTransfer task, which is much better than random (11\% accuracy) but falls short of the 87\% accuracy of a classifier trained directly on labeled sketches. This indicates that this task is approachable with today's best methods but has substantial room for improvement.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes