Comparing acoustic analyses of speech data collected remotely
This provides a practical solution for phonetic researchers facing data collection challenges, though it is incremental as it adapts existing methods to new constraints.
The study tackled the problem of collecting speech data during COVID-19 restrictions by comparing remote recording methods, finding that lossless phone recordings performed better than Zoom for formant analysis, with F0 tracked accurately by all devices.
Face-to-face speech data collection has been next to impossible globally due to COVID-19 restrictions. To address this problem, simultaneous recordings of three repetitions of the cardinal vowels were made using a Zoom H6 Handy Recorder with external microphone (henceforth H6) and compared with two alternatives accessible to potential participants at home: the Zoom meeting application (henceforth Zoom) and two lossless mobile phone applications (Awesome Voice Recorder, and Recorder; henceforth Phone). F0 was tracked accurately by all devices; however, for formant analysis (F1, F2, F3) Phone performed better than Zoom, i.e. more similarly to H6, though data extraction method (VoiceSauce, Praat) also resulted in differences. In addition, Zoom recordings exhibited unexpected drops in intensity. The results suggest that lossless format phone recordings present a viable option for at least some phonetic studies.