LGCLMLJun 7, 2021

Counterfactual Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Training Deep Networks

arXiv:2106.03831v29 citations
Originality Highly original
AI Analysis

This addresses the issue of spurious correlations in deep learning for researchers and practitioners, offering a novel causal approach to enhance model robustness.

The authors tackled the problem of deep learning models learning spurious correlations by proposing a causality-based training framework called Counterfactual Maximum Likelihood Estimation (CMLE), which improved out-of-domain generalization and reduced spurious correlations in experiments on simulated data, Natural Language Inference, and Image Captioning.

Although deep learning models have driven state-of-the-art performance on a wide array of tasks, they are prone to spurious correlations that should not be learned as predictive clues. To mitigate this problem, we propose a causality-based training framework to reduce the spurious correlations caused by observed confounders. We give theoretical analysis on the underlying general Structural Causal Model (SCM) and propose to perform Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) on the interventional distribution instead of the observational distribution, namely Counterfactual Maximum Likelihood Estimation (CMLE). As the interventional distribution, in general, is hidden from the observational data, we then derive two different upper bounds of the expected negative log-likelihood and propose two general algorithms, Implicit CMLE and Explicit CMLE, for causal predictions of deep learning models using observational data. We conduct experiments on both simulated data and two real-world tasks: Natural Language Inference (NLI) and Image Captioning. The results show that CMLE methods outperform the regular MLE method in terms of out-of-domain generalization performance and reducing spurious correlations, while maintaining comparable performance on the regular evaluations.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes