CLSep 20, 2021

Intensionalizing Abstract Meaning Representations: Non-Veridicality and Scope

arXiv:2109.09858v1661 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses limitations in AMR for formal linguistics and NLP applications, though it is incremental as it builds on existing methods like STLC and Cooper storage.

The paper tackled the problem of representing non-veridical intensional contexts and quantifier scope ambiguities in Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) by mapping AMRs into Simply-Typed Lambda Calculus and using Cooper storage, enabling the derivation of de re, de dicto, and intermediate scope readings.

Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) is a graphical meaning representation language designed to represent propositional information about argument structure. However, at present it is unable to satisfyingly represent non-veridical intensional contexts, often licensing inappropriate inferences. In this paper, we show how to resolve the problem of non-veridicality without appealing to layered graphs through a mapping from AMRs into Simply-Typed Lambda Calculus (STLC). At least for some cases, this requires the introduction of a new role :content which functions as an intensional operator. The translation proposed is inspired by the formal linguistics literature on the event semantics of attitude reports. Next, we address the interaction of quantifier scope and intensional operators in so-called de re/de dicto ambiguities. We adopt a scope node from the literature and provide an explicit multidimensional semantics utilizing Cooper storage which allows us to derive the de re and de dicto scope readings as well as intermediate scope readings which prove difficult for accounts without a scope node.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes