CLOct 22, 2021

ListReader: Extracting List-form Answers for Opinion Questions

arXiv:2110.11692v12 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses a limitation in QA for real-world scenarios where answers are list-form, but it is incremental as it builds on existing extractive models.

The paper tackles the problem of extracting list-form answers for non-factoid opinion questions in QA, where existing models fail due to non-contiguous spans, and results show that ListReader considerably outperforms strong baselines on two large-scale datasets.

Question answering (QA) is a high-level ability of natural language processing. Most extractive ma-chine reading comprehension models focus on factoid questions (e.g., who, when, where) and restrict the output answer as a short and continuous span in the original passage. However, in real-world scenarios, many questions are non-factoid (e.g., how, why) and their answers are organized in the list format that contains multiple non-contiguous spans. Naturally, existing extractive models are by design unable to answer such questions. To address this issue, this paper proposes ListReader, a neural ex-tractive QA model for list-form answer. In addition to learning the alignment between the question and content, we introduce a heterogeneous graph neural network to explicitly capture the associations among candidate segments. Moreover, our model adopts a co-extraction setting that can extract either span- or sentence-level answers, allowing better applicability. Two large-scale datasets of different languages are constructed to support this study. Experimental results show that our model considerably outperforms various strong baselines. Further discussions provide an intuitive understanding of how our model works and where the performance gain comes from.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes