CLAIOct 25, 2021

"So You Think You're Funny?": Rating the Humour Quotient in Standup Comedy

arXiv:2110.12765v1663 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses the challenge of humor measurement for computational linguistics, though it is incremental as it builds on existing datasets and methods.

The authors tackled the problem of automatically rating humor in stand-up comedy by creating a multi-modal dataset annotated with humor scores based on audience laughter, achieving a model accuracy of 0.813 in Quadratic Weighted Kappa.

Computational Humour (CH) has attracted the interest of Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics communities. Creating datasets for automatic measurement of humour quotient is difficult due to multiple possible interpretations of the content. In this work, we create a multi-modal humour-annotated dataset ($\sim$40 hours) using stand-up comedy clips. We devise a novel scoring mechanism to annotate the training data with a humour quotient score using the audience's laughter. The normalized duration (laughter duration divided by the clip duration) of laughter in each clip is used to compute this humour coefficient score on a five-point scale (0-4). This method of scoring is validated by comparing with manually annotated scores, wherein a quadratic weighted kappa of 0.6 is obtained. We use this dataset to train a model that provides a "funniness" score, on a five-point scale, given the audio and its corresponding text. We compare various neural language models for the task of humour-rating and achieve an accuracy of $0.813$ in terms of Quadratic Weighted Kappa (QWK). Our "Open Mic" dataset is released for further research along with the code.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes