LGAIMLMar 4, 2022

R-GCN: The R Could Stand for Random

arXiv:2203.02424v216 citationsh-index: 26
AI Analysis

This challenges the necessity of learned parameters in graph neural networks for knowledge graphs, potentially simplifying model design and training, though it is incremental as it builds on existing R-GCN frameworks.

The paper argues that the main contribution of Relational Graph Convolutional Networks (R-GCNs) is the message-passing paradigm rather than learned weights, and introduces Random R-GCNs (RR-GCNs) with no trained parameters, showing they can compete with fully trained R-GCNs in node classification and link prediction tasks.

The inception of the Relational Graph Convolutional Network (R-GCN) marked a milestone in the Semantic Web domain as a widely cited method that generalises end-to-end hierarchical representation learning to Knowledge Graphs (KGs). R-GCNs generate representations for nodes of interest by repeatedly aggregating parameterised, relation-specific transformations of their neighbours. However, in this paper, we argue that the the R-GCN's main contribution lies in this "message passing" paradigm, rather than the learned weights. To this end, we introduce the "Random Relational Graph Convolutional Network" (RR-GCN), which leaves all parameters untrained and thus constructs node embeddings by aggregating randomly transformed random representations from neighbours, i.e., with no learned parameters. We empirically show that RR-GCNs can compete with fully trained R-GCNs in both node classification and link prediction settings.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes