LGCYDSJun 15, 2022

Metric-Fair Classifier Derandomization

arXiv:2206.07826v25 citationsh-index: 25
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses fairness issues in machine learning for applications requiring deterministic decisions, offering a tradeoff between fairness and accuracy, but it is incremental as it builds on existing derandomization work.

The paper tackles the problem of classifier derandomization with metric fairness guarantees, showing that prior methods are highly unfair and proposing a new procedure that achieves O(α)-metric fairness and close approximation of the stochastic classifier with high probability.

We study the problem of classifier derandomization in machine learning: given a stochastic binary classifier $f: X \to [0,1]$, sample a deterministic classifier $\hat{f}: X \to \{0,1\}$ that approximates the output of $f$ in aggregate over any data distribution. Recent work revealed how to efficiently derandomize a stochastic classifier with strong output approximation guarantees, but at the cost of individual fairness -- that is, if $f$ treated similar inputs similarly, $\hat{f}$ did not. In this paper, we initiate a systematic study of classifier derandomization with metric fairness guarantees. We show that the prior derandomization approach is almost maximally metric-unfair, and that a simple ``random threshold'' derandomization achieves optimal fairness preservation but with weaker output approximation. We then devise a derandomization procedure that provides an appealing tradeoff between these two: if $f$ is $α$-metric fair according to a metric $d$ with a locality-sensitive hash (LSH) family, then our derandomized $\hat{f}$ is, with high probability, $O(α)$-metric fair and a close approximation of $f$. We also prove generic results applicable to all (fair and unfair) classifier derandomization procedures, including a bias-variance decomposition and reductions between various notions of metric fairness.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes