Temporal Concept Drift and Alignment: An empirical approach to comparing Knowledge Organization Systems over time
This work addresses the challenge of aligning historical and modern knowledge systems for humanities researchers, though it is incremental in demonstrating a method for studying such changes.
This research tackled the problem of temporal concept drift in knowledge organization systems by comparing 1910 and 2020 vocabularies on historical encyclopedia entries, confirming that historical vocabularies can generate anachronistic subject headings to represent conceptual changes over time.
This research explores temporal concept drift and temporal alignment in knowledge organization systems (KOS). A comparative analysis is pursued using the 1910 Library of Congress Subject Headings, 2020 FAST Topical, and automatic indexing. The use case involves a sample of 90 nineteenth-century Encyclopedia Britannica entries. The entries were indexed using two approaches: 1) full-text indexing; 2) Named Entity Recognition was performed upon the entries with Stanza, Stanford's NLP toolkit, and entities were automatically indexed with the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary application (HIVE), using both 1910 LCSH and FAST Topical. The analysis focused on three goals: 1) identifying results that were exclusive to the 1910 LCSH output; 2) identifying terms in the exclusive set that have been deprecated from the contemporary LCSH, demonstrating temporal concept drift; and 3) exploring the historical significance of these deprecated terms. Results confirm that historical vocabularies can be used to generate anachronistic subject headings representing conceptual drift across time in KOS and historical resources. A methodological contribution is made demonstrating how to study changes in KOS over time and improve the contextualization of historical humanities resources.