A New Hip Fracture Risk Index Derived from FEA-Computed Proximal Femur Fracture Loads and Energies-to-Failure
This work addresses hip fracture risk prediction for clinical applications, but it is incremental as it builds on existing FEA methods with a new statistical combination.
The researchers tackled hip fracture risk assessment by developing a new risk index using principal component analysis on finite element analysis (FEA) parameters from CT scans, finding that the first principal component (PC1) was the only significant predictor and improved prediction performance in male subjects with higher AUC values.
Hip fracture risk assessment is an important but challenging task. Quantitative CT-based patient specific finite element analysis (FEA) computes the force (fracture load) to break the proximal femur in a particular loading condition. It provides different structural information about the proximal femur that can influence a subject overall fracture risk. To obtain a more robust measure of fracture risk, we used principal component analysis (PCA) to develop a global FEA computed fracture risk index that incorporates the FEA-computed yield and ultimate failure loads and energies to failure in four loading conditions (single-limb stance and impact from a fall onto the posterior, posterolateral, and lateral aspects of the greater trochanter) of 110 hip fracture subjects and 235 age and sex matched control subjects from the AGES-Reykjavik study. We found that the first PC (PC1) of the FE parameters was the only significant predictor of hip fracture. Using a logistic regression model, we determined if prediction performance for hip fracture using PC1 differed from that using FE parameters combined by stratified random resampling with respect to hip fracture status. The results showed that the average of the area under the receive operating characteristic curve (AUC) using PC1 was always higher than that using all FE parameters combined in the male subjects. The AUC of PC1 and AUC of the FE parameters combined were not significantly different than that in the female subjects or in all subjects