NECVOct 24, 2022

SpikeSim: An end-to-end Compute-in-Memory Hardware Evaluation Tool for Benchmarking Spiking Neural Networks

arXiv:2210.12899v134 citationsh-index: 100
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses hardware evaluation challenges for SNNs on IMC platforms, which is important for researchers in neuromorphic computing, but it is incremental as it builds on existing IMC and SNN accelerator research.

The authors tackled the problem of evaluating spiking neural networks (SNNs) on in-memory computing (IMC) hardware by developing SpikeSim, a tool that assesses performance, energy, latency, and area, revealing that SNN-specific components like LIF/IF modules contribute over 11% of hardware area and proposing modifications that reduce area by 1.24x and energy-delay-product by 10x.

SNNs are an active research domain towards energy efficient machine intelligence. Compared to conventional ANNs, SNNs use temporal spike data and bio-plausible neuronal activation functions such as Leaky-Integrate Fire/Integrate Fire (LIF/IF) for data processing. However, SNNs incur significant dot-product operations causing high memory and computation overhead in standard von-Neumann computing platforms. Today, In-Memory Computing (IMC) architectures have been proposed to alleviate the "memory-wall bottleneck" prevalent in von-Neumann architectures. Although recent works have proposed IMC-based SNN hardware accelerators, the following have been overlooked- 1) the adverse effects of crossbar non-ideality on SNN performance due to repeated analog dot-product operations over multiple time-steps, 2) hardware overheads of essential SNN-specific components such as the LIF/IF and data communication modules. To this end, we propose SpikeSim, a tool that can perform realistic performance, energy, latency and area evaluation of IMC-mapped SNNs. SpikeSim consists of a practical monolithic IMC architecture called SpikeFlow for mapping SNNs. Additionally, the non-ideality computation engine (NICE) and energy-latency-area (ELA) engine performs hardware-realistic evaluation of SpikeFlow-mapped SNNs. Based on 65nm CMOS implementation and experiments on CIFAR10, CIFAR100 and TinyImagenet datasets, we find that the LIF/IF neuronal module has significant area contribution (>11% of the total hardware area). We propose SNN topological modifications leading to 1.24x and 10x reduction in the neuronal module's area and the overall energy-delay-product value, respectively. Furthermore, in this work, we perform a holistic comparison between IMC implemented ANN and SNNs and conclude that lower number of time-steps are the key to achieve higher throughput and energy-efficiency for SNNs compared to 4-bit ANNs.

Code Implementations2 repos
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes