Can Membership Inferencing be Refuted?
This work challenges the practical implications of membership inference attacks for privacy assessment in machine learning, suggesting a need for re-evaluation.
The authors tackled the reliability of membership inference attacks by showing that model owners can refute such attacks by constructing proofs of repudiation, demonstrating feasibility on MNIST and CIFAR-10 models.
Membership inference (MI) attack is currently the most popular test for measuring privacy leakage in machine learning models. Given a machine learning model, a data point and some auxiliary information, the goal of an MI attack is to determine whether the data point was used to train the model. In this work, we study the reliability of membership inference attacks in practice. Specifically, we show that a model owner can plausibly refute the result of a membership inference test on a data point $x$ by constructing a proof of repudiation that proves that the model was trained without $x$. We design efficient algorithms to construct proofs of repudiation for all data points of the training dataset. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates the practical feasibility of our algorithm by constructing proofs of repudiation for popular machine learning models on MNIST and CIFAR-10. Consequently, our results call for a re-evaluation of the implications of membership inference attacks in practice.