LGJun 22, 2023

A Comparison of Time-based Models for Multimodal Emotion Recognition

arXiv:2306.13076v1h-index: 3
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This work addresses emotion recognition for human-computer interaction, but it is incremental as it compares existing methods on a standard dataset.

The study compared different sequence models (GRU, Transformer, LSTM, Max Pooling) for multimodal emotion recognition using sound and images, finding that GRU achieved the best F1 score of 0.640, LSTM the best precision of 0.699, and Max Pooling the best sensitivity of 0.620 on the CREMA-D dataset.

Emotion recognition has become an important research topic in the field of human-computer interaction. Studies on sound and videos to understand emotions focused mainly on analyzing facial expressions and classified 6 basic emotions. In this study, the performance of different sequence models in multi-modal emotion recognition was compared. The sound and images were first processed by multi-layered CNN models, and the outputs of these models were fed into various sequence models. The sequence model is GRU, Transformer, LSTM and Max Pooling. Accuracy, precision, and F1 Score values of all models were calculated. The multi-modal CREMA-D dataset was used in the experiments. As a result of the comparison of the CREMA-D dataset, GRU-based architecture with 0.640 showed the best result in F1 score, LSTM-based architecture with 0.699 in precision metric, while sensitivity showed the best results over time with Max Pooling-based architecture with 0.620. As a result, it has been observed that the sequence models compare performances close to each other.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes