CLDec 6, 2023

Evaluating and Mitigating Discrimination in Language Model Decisions

Stanford
arXiv:2312.03689v1125 citationsh-index: 32Has Code
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses ethical concerns for developers and policymakers in applying LMs to decisions like financing or housing, though it is incremental as it builds on existing evaluation and mitigation approaches.

The paper tackles the problem of discrimination in language models (LMs) used for high-stakes societal decisions by developing a method to evaluate and mitigate it, revealing patterns of discrimination in the Claude 2.0 model and demonstrating techniques that significantly decrease discrimination through prompt engineering.

As language models (LMs) advance, interest is growing in applying them to high-stakes societal decisions, such as determining financing or housing eligibility. However, their potential for discrimination in such contexts raises ethical concerns, motivating the need for better methods to evaluate these risks. We present a method for proactively evaluating the potential discriminatory impact of LMs in a wide range of use cases, including hypothetical use cases where they have not yet been deployed. Specifically, we use an LM to generate a wide array of potential prompts that decision-makers may input into an LM, spanning 70 diverse decision scenarios across society, and systematically vary the demographic information in each prompt. Applying this methodology reveals patterns of both positive and negative discrimination in the Claude 2.0 model in select settings when no interventions are applied. While we do not endorse or permit the use of language models to make automated decisions for the high-risk use cases we study, we demonstrate techniques to significantly decrease both positive and negative discrimination through careful prompt engineering, providing pathways toward safer deployment in use cases where they may be appropriate. Our work enables developers and policymakers to anticipate, measure, and address discrimination as language model capabilities and applications continue to expand. We release our dataset and prompts at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Anthropic/discrim-eval

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes