LGMLDec 15, 2023

PAC-Bayes Generalisation Bounds for Dynamical Systems Including Stable RNNs

arXiv:2312.09793v15 citationsh-index: 20AAAI
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This provides theoretical guarantees for RNN generalization in non-i.i.d. time-series data, which is incremental as it extends existing bounds to specific stable systems.

The paper tackles the problem of deriving generalization bounds for stable recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and other dynamical systems in supervised time-series settings, resulting in a PAC-Bayes bound that converges to zero with dataset size and does not grow with the number of RNN steps.

In this paper, we derive a PAC-Bayes bound on the generalisation gap, in a supervised time-series setting for a special class of discrete-time non-linear dynamical systems. This class includes stable recurrent neural networks (RNN), and the motivation for this work was its application to RNNs. In order to achieve the results, we impose some stability constraints, on the allowed models. Here, stability is understood in the sense of dynamical systems. For RNNs, these stability conditions can be expressed in terms of conditions on the weights. We assume the processes involved are essentially bounded and the loss functions are Lipschitz. The proposed bound on the generalisation gap depends on the mixing coefficient of the data distribution, and the essential supremum of the data. Furthermore, the bound converges to zero as the dataset size increases. In this paper, we 1) formalize the learning problem, 2) derive a PAC-Bayesian error bound for such systems, 3) discuss various consequences of this error bound, and 4) show an illustrative example, with discussions on computing the proposed bound. Unlike other available bounds the derived bound holds for non i.i.d. data (time-series) and it does not grow with the number of steps of the RNN.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes