CLFeb 3, 2024

GITA: Graph to Visual and Textual Integration for Vision-Language Graph Reasoning

arXiv:2402.02130v543 citationsh-index: 13NIPS
AI Analysis

This addresses the limitation of LLMs in handling graph-based reasoning by leveraging visual modalities, potentially improving performance in domains requiring structural understanding, though it appears incremental by building on existing graph data and LLM capabilities.

The paper tackles the problem of enabling large language models (LLMs) to reason with graph structures by incorporating visual representations, proposing GITA, an end-to-end framework that integrates visual graphs and textual information, and shows it outperforms mainstream LLMs on general graph reasoning tasks across multiple datasets.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for various tasks with graph structures. Though LLMs can process graph information in a textual format, they overlook the rich vision modality, which is an intuitive way for humans to comprehend structural information and conduct general graph reasoning. The potential benefits and capabilities of representing graph structures as visual images (i.e., $\textit{visual graph}$) are still unexplored. To fill the gap, we innovatively propose an end-to-end framework, called $\textbf{G}$raph to v$\textbf{I}$sual and $\textbf{T}$extual Integr$\textbf{A}$tion (GITA), which firstly incorporates visual graphs into general graph reasoning. Besides, we establish $\textbf{G}$raph-based $\textbf{V}$ision-$\textbf{L}$anguage $\textbf{Q}$uestion $\textbf{A}$nswering (GVLQA) dataset from existing graph data, which is the first vision-language dataset for general graph reasoning purposes. Extensive experiments on the GVLQA dataset and five real-world datasets show that GITA outperforms mainstream LLMs in terms of general graph reasoning capabilities. Moreover, We highlight the effectiveness of the layout augmentation on visual graphs and pretraining on the GVLQA dataset.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes