Enhancing Investment Opinion Ranking through Argument-Based Sentiment Analysis
This addresses the need for efficient recommendation systems for investors to handle overwhelming online opinion data, though it appears incremental in applying argument mining to a specific domain.
The paper tackled the problem of filtering and ranking investment opinions from online posts by introducing a dual-pronged argument mining technique that uses price discrepancies and argument scoring to identify opinions with higher profit potential, as confirmed by experimental results.
In the era of rapid Internet and social media platform development, individuals readily share their viewpoints online. The overwhelming quantity of these posts renders comprehensive analysis impractical. This necessitates an efficient recommendation system to filter and present significant, relevant opinions. Our research introduces a dual-pronged argument mining technique to improve recommendation system effectiveness, considering both professional and amateur investor perspectives. Our first strategy involves using the discrepancy between target and closing prices as an opinion indicator. The second strategy applies argument mining principles to score investors' opinions, subsequently ranking them by these scores. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of our approach, demonstrating its ability to identify opinions with higher profit potential. Beyond profitability, our research extends to risk analysis, examining the relationship between recommended opinions and investor behaviors. This offers a holistic view of potential outcomes following the adoption of these recommended opinions.