Improving Your Model Ranking on Chatbot Arena by Vote Rigging
This exposes a vulnerability in widely used LLM evaluation platforms, which could undermine trust in model rankings, though it is incremental as it builds on existing mechanisms like Elo ratings.
The paper tackles the problem of vote rigging on Chatbot Arena, a platform for evaluating LLMs through pairwise battles, by showing that crowdsourced voting can be manipulated to improve or decrease a target model's ranking, with experiments demonstrating that omnipresent rigging strategies can boost rankings by rigging only hundreds of votes.
Chatbot Arena is a popular platform for evaluating LLMs by pairwise battles, where users vote for their preferred response from two randomly sampled anonymous models. While Chatbot Arena is widely regarded as a reliable LLM ranking leaderboard, we show that crowdsourced voting can be rigged to improve (or decrease) the ranking of a target model $m_{t}$. We first introduce a straightforward target-only rigging strategy that focuses on new battles involving $m_{t}$, identifying it via watermarking or a binary classifier, and exclusively voting for $m_{t}$ wins. However, this strategy is practically inefficient because there are over $190$ models on Chatbot Arena and on average only about $1\%$ of new battles will involve $m_{t}$. To overcome this, we propose omnipresent rigging strategies, exploiting the Elo rating mechanism of Chatbot Arena that any new vote on a battle can influence the ranking of the target model $m_{t}$, even if $m_{t}$ is not directly involved in the battle. We conduct experiments on around $1.7$ million historical votes from the Chatbot Arena Notebook, showing that omnipresent rigging strategies can improve model rankings by rigging only hundreds of new votes. While we have evaluated several defense mechanisms, our findings highlight the importance of continued efforts to prevent vote rigging. Our code is available at https://github.com/sail-sg/Rigging-ChatbotArena.