Is there a future for AI without representation?
This challenges foundational assumptions in AI about representation and central control, potentially shifting paradigms for intelligent agent design.
The paper examines the viability of AI without representation, focusing on Rodney Brooks' proposal, and argues that rejecting central control in intelligent agents makes non-representational cognition promising for full-blown intelligence, though not for human-like AI.
This paper investigates the prospects of AI without representation in general, and the proposals of Rodney Brooks in particular. What turns out to be characteristic of Brooks' proposal is the rejection of central control in intelligent agents; his systems has as much or as little representation as traditional AI. The traditional view that representation is necessary for intelligence presupposes that intelligence requires central control. However, much of recent cognitive science suggests that we should dispose of the image of intelligent agents as central representation processors. If this paradigm shift is achieved, Brooks' proposal for non-centralized cognition without representation appears promising for full-blown intelligent agents - though not for conscious agents and thus not for human-like AI.