Towards Assessing Deep Learning Test Input Generators
This provides practical guidance for selecting test input generators in safety-critical deep learning applications, but it is incremental as it evaluates existing methods without introducing new ones.
The paper assessed four deep learning test input generators (DeepHunter, DeepFault, AdvGAN, SinVAD) across fault-revealing capability, naturalness, diversity, and efficiency using models like LeNet-5 and datasets including MNIST and ImageNet-1K, finding trade-offs in performance and that effectiveness varies with dataset complexity.
Deep Learning (DL) systems are increasingly deployed in safety-critical applications, yet they remain vulnerable to robustness issues that can lead to significant failures. While numerous Test Input Generators (TIGs) have been developed to evaluate DL robustness, a comprehensive assessment of their effectiveness across different dimensions is still lacking. This paper presents a comprehensive assessment of four state-of-the-art TIGs--DeepHunter, DeepFault, AdvGAN, and SinVAD--across multiple critical aspects: fault-revealing capability, naturalness, diversity, and efficiency. Our empirical study leverages three pre-trained models (LeNet-5, VGG16, and EfficientNetB3) on datasets of varying complexity (MNIST, CIFAR-10, and ImageNet-1K) to evaluate TIG performance. Our findings reveal important trade-offs in robustness revealing capability, variation in test case generation, and computational efficiency across TIGs. The results also show that TIG performance varies significantly with dataset complexity, as tools that perform well on simpler datasets may struggle with more complex ones. In contrast, others maintain steadier performance or better scalability. This paper offers practical guidance for selecting appropriate TIGs aligned with specific objectives and dataset characteristics. Nonetheless, more work is needed to address TIG limitations and advance TIGs for real-world, safety-critical systems.