DSLGSTMLApr 3, 2025

Computing High-dimensional Confidence Sets for Arbitrary Distributions

arXiv:2504.02723v23 citationsh-index: 4COLT
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses a central problem in high-dimensional statistics for uncertainty quantification, with incremental improvements in approximation bounds.

The paper tackles the problem of learning high-density confidence sets for arbitrary distributions in high dimensions, achieving an algorithm that outputs an ellipsoid with volume competitive within an exp(˜O(d^{1/2})) factor of the optimal ball, while showing computational intractability for proper learning within a similar factor.

We study the problem of learning a high-density region of an arbitrary distribution over $\mathbb{R}^d$. Given a target coverage parameter $δ$, and sample access to an arbitrary distribution $D$, we want to output a confidence set $S \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ such that $S$ achieves $δ$ coverage of $D$, i.e., $\mathbb{P}_{y \sim D} \left[ y \in S \right] \ge δ$, and the volume of $S$ is as small as possible. This is a central problem in high-dimensional statistics with applications in finding confidence sets, uncertainty quantification, and support estimation. In the most general setting, this problem is statistically intractable, so we restrict our attention to competing with sets from a concept class $C$ with bounded VC-dimension. An algorithm is competitive with class $C$ if, given samples from an arbitrary distribution $D$, it outputs in polynomial time a set that achieves $δ$ coverage of $D$, and whose volume is competitive with the smallest set in $C$ with the required coverage $δ$. This problem is computationally challenging even in the basic setting when $C$ is the set of all Euclidean balls. Existing algorithms based on coresets find in polynomial time a ball whose volume is $\exp(\tilde{O}( d/ \log d))$-factor competitive with the volume of the best ball. Our main result is an algorithm that finds a confidence set whose volume is $\exp(\tilde{O}(d^{1/2}))$ factor competitive with the optimal ball having the desired coverage. The algorithm is improper (it outputs an ellipsoid). Combined with our computational intractability result for proper learning balls within an $\exp(\tilde{O}(d^{1-o(1)}))$ approximation factor in volume, our results provide an interesting separation between proper and (improper) learning of confidence sets.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes