Query Complexity of Classical and Quantum Channel Discrimination
This work addresses a fundamental problem in quantum information theory for researchers, offering incremental improvements by refining existing bounds and extending results to various channel types.
The paper tackles the problem of determining the minimum number of channel uses (query complexity) needed to discriminate between quantum channels with a desired error probability, showing that it depends logarithmically on the inverse error probability and inversely on channel fidelity measures. It provides precise characterizations for classical and classical-quantum channels, along with bounds for asymmetric and multiple channel discrimination.
Quantum channel discrimination has been studied from an information-theoretic perspective, wherein one is interested in the optimal decay rate of error probabilities as a function of the number of unknown channel accesses. In this paper, we study the query complexity of quantum channel discrimination, wherein the goal is to determine the minimum number of channel uses needed to reach a desired error probability. To this end, we show that the query complexity of binary channel discrimination depends logarithmically on the inverse error probability and inversely on the negative logarithm of the (geometric and Holevo) channel fidelity. As a special case of these findings, we precisely characterize the query complexity of discriminating two classical channels and two classical-quantum channels. Furthermore, by obtaining an optimal characterization of the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing, including prior probabilities, we provide a more precise characterization of query complexity when the error probability does not exceed a fixed threshold. We also provide lower and upper bounds on the query complexity of binary asymmetric channel discrimination and multiple quantum channel discrimination. For the former, the query complexity depends on the geometric Rényi and Petz Rényi channel divergences, while for the latter, it depends on the negative logarithm of the (geometric and Uhlmann) channel fidelity. For multiple channel discrimination, the upper bound scales as the logarithm of the number of channels.