Rethinking the Relationship between the Power Law and Hierarchical Structures
This work addresses a foundational issue in linguistics and computational analysis by questioning a widely accepted interpretation of statistical patterns in language, with implications for understanding language universals and evolution.
The study tested whether power-law decay of correlation in language corpora indicates underlying hierarchical syntactic structures, finding that the assumptions do not hold for syntactic structures in English and Japanese, challenging the applicability to child speeches and animal signals.
Statistical analysis of corpora provides an approach to quantitatively investigate natural languages. This approach has revealed that several power laws consistently emerge across different corpora and languages, suggesting universal mechanisms underlying languages. Particularly, the power-law decay of correlation has been interpreted as evidence for underlying hierarchical structures in syntax, semantics, and discourse. This perspective has also been extended to child speeches and animal signals. However, the argument supporting this interpretation has not been empirically tested in natural languages. To address this problem, the present study examines the validity of the argument for syntactic structures. Specifically, we test whether the statistical properties of parse trees align with the assumptions in the argument. Using English and Japanese corpora, we analyze the mutual information, deviations from probabilistic context-free grammars (PCFGs), and other properties in natural language parse trees, as well as in the PCFG that approximates these parse trees. Our results indicate that the assumptions do not hold for syntactic structures and that it is difficult to apply the proposed argument to child speeches and animal signals, highlighting the need to reconsider the relationship between the power law and hierarchical structures.