AICLCVHCApr 20

ScienceBoard: Evaluating Multimodal Autonomous Agents in Realistic Scientific Workflows

arXiv:2505.1989769.224 citationsh-index: 19
Predicted impact top 2% in AI · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

For researchers developing autonomous scientific agents, this work provides a rigorous benchmark revealing that current agents are far from reliable in complex scientific workflows.

ScienceBoard introduces a realistic, multi-domain environment and a benchmark of 169 real-world tasks for evaluating LLM-based computer-using agents in scientific workflows. State-of-the-art agents achieve only a 15% overall success rate, indicating significant room for improvement.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have extended their impact beyond Natural Language Processing, substantially fostering the development of interdisciplinary research. Recently, various LLM-based agents have been developed to assist scientific discovery progress across multiple aspects and domains. Among these, computer-using agents, capable of interacting with operating systems as humans do, are paving the way to automated scientific problem-solving and addressing routines in researchers' workflows. Recognizing the transformative potential of these agents, we introduce ScienceBoard, which encompasses two complementary contributions: (i) a realistic, multi-domain environment featuring dynamic and visually rich scientific workflows with integrated professional software, where agents can autonomously interact via different interfaces to accelerate complex research tasks and experiments; and (ii) a challenging benchmark of 169 high-quality, rigorously validated real-world tasks curated by humans, spanning scientific-discovery workflows in domains such as biochemistry, astronomy, and geoinformatics. Extensive evaluations of agents with state-of-the-art backbones (e.g., GPT-4o, Claude 3.7, UI-TARS) show that, despite some promising results, they still fall short of reliably assisting scientists in complex workflows, achieving only a 15% overall success rate. In-depth analysis further provides valuable insights for addressing current agent limitations and more effective design principles, paving the way to build more capable agents for scientific discovery. Our code, environment, and benchmark are at https://qiushisun.github.io/ScienceBoard-Home/.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes