CLJun 18, 2025

Lessons from Training Grounded LLMs with Verifiable Rewards

arXiv:2506.15522v14 citationsh-index: 77
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the challenge of making LLMs more reliable for users in tasks requiring accurate citations and refusal handling, though it is incremental as it builds on existing methods like RAG and RL.

The paper tackles the problem of improving grounding and trustworthiness in large language models by using reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards, showing that reasoning-augmented models outperform instruction-only variants, with significant gains in handling unanswerable queries and generating well-cited responses across multiple datasets.

Generating grounded and trustworthy responses remains a key challenge for large language models (LLMs). While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with citation-based grounding holds promise, instruction-tuned models frequently fail even in straightforward scenarios: missing explicitly stated answers, citing incorrectly, or refusing when evidence is available. In this work, we explore how reinforcement learning (RL) and internal reasoning can enhance grounding in LLMs. We use the GRPO (Group Relative Policy Optimization) method to train models using verifiable outcome-based rewards targeting answer correctness, citation sufficiency, and refusal quality, without requiring gold reasoning traces or expensive annotations. Through comprehensive experiments across ASQA, QAMPARI, ELI5, and ExpertQA we show that reasoning-augmented models significantly outperform instruction-only variants, especially in handling unanswerable queries and generating well-cited responses. A two-stage training setup, first optimizing answer and citation behavior and then refusal, further improves grounding by stabilizing the learning signal. Additionally, we revisit instruction tuning via GPT-4 distillation and find that combining it with GRPO enhances performance on long-form, generative QA tasks. Overall, our findings highlight the value of reasoning, stage-wise optimization, and outcome-driven RL for building more verifiable and reliable LLMs.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes