Forecasting Faculty Placement from Patterns in Co-authorship Networks
This work addresses the problem of understanding and potentially mitigating structural biases in academic hiring for researchers and institutions, though it is incremental as it builds on existing studies by adding network data.
The paper tackled the problem of predicting individual faculty hiring outcomes by using temporal co-authorship networks, finding that this approach improves predictive accuracy by up to 10% over traditional indicators like doctoral department prestige and bibliometric features, with the largest gains for placements at top-10 departments.
Faculty hiring shapes the flow of ideas, resources, and opportunities in academia, influencing not only individual career trajectories but also broader patterns of institutional prestige and scientific progress. While traditional studies have found strong correlations between faculty hiring and attributes such as doctoral department prestige and publication record, they rarely assess whether these associations generalize to individual hiring outcomes, particularly for future candidates outside the original sample. Here, we consider faculty placement as an individual-level prediction task. Our data consist of temporal co-authorship networks with conventional attributes such as doctoral department prestige and bibliometric features. We observe that using the co-authorship network significantly improves predictive accuracy by up to 10% over traditional indicators alone, with the largest gains observed for placements at the most elite (top-10) departments. Our results underscore the role that social networks, professional endorsements, and implicit advocacy play in faculty hiring beyond traditional measures of scholarly productivity and institutional prestige. By introducing a predictive framing of faculty placement and establishing the benefit of considering co-authorship networks, this work provides a new lens for understanding structural biases in academia that could inform targeted interventions aimed at increasing transparency, fairness, and equity in academic hiring practices.