CLAug 7, 2025

Decision-Making with Deliberation: Meta-reviewing as a Document-grounded Dialogue

arXiv:2508.05283v12 citationsh-index: 28Has Code
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses the challenge of improving decision-making efficiency for meta-reviewers in academic peer review, representing an incremental advancement in applying dialogue agents to expert domains.

The paper tackles the problem of assisting meta-reviewers in peer review by developing dialogue agents that weigh reviewer arguments and contextualize them, resulting in agents that outperform off-the-shelf LLM-based assistants and enhance meta-reviewing efficiency.

Meta-reviewing is a pivotal stage in the peer-review process, serving as the final step in determining whether a paper is recommended for acceptance. Prior research on meta-reviewing has treated this as a summarization problem over review reports. However, complementary to this perspective, meta-reviewing is a decision-making process that requires weighing reviewer arguments and placing them within a broader context. Prior research has demonstrated that decision-makers can be effectively assisted in such scenarios via dialogue agents. In line with this framing, we explore the practical challenges for realizing dialog agents that can effectively assist meta-reviewers. Concretely, we first address the issue of data scarcity for training dialogue agents by generating synthetic data using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on a self-refinement strategy to improve the relevance of these dialogues to expert domains. Our experiments demonstrate that this method produces higher-quality synthetic data and can serve as a valuable resource towards training meta-reviewing assistants. Subsequently, we utilize this data to train dialogue agents tailored for meta-reviewing and find that these agents outperform \emph{off-the-shelf} LLM-based assistants for this task. Finally, we apply our agents in real-world meta-reviewing scenarios and confirm their effectiveness in enhancing the efficiency of meta-reviewing.\footnote{Code and Data: https://github.com/UKPLab/arxiv2025-meta-review-as-dialog

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes