MLLGSTOct 31, 2025

Optimal Convergence Analysis of DDPM for General Distributions

arXiv:2510.27562v19 citationsh-index: 7
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This provides a tight theoretical analysis for diffusion models, which is incremental but important for researchers in machine learning theory and generative modeling.

The paper tackles the problem of understanding the convergence properties of the Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model (DDPM) sampler, establishing a near-optimal convergence rate of Õ(d min{d, L²}/T²) in KL divergence under general distributional assumptions, which improves upon the best-known d²/T² rate when L < √d.

Score-based diffusion models have achieved remarkable empirical success in generating high-quality samples from target data distributions. Among them, the Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model (DDPM) is one of the most widely used samplers, generating samples via estimated score functions. Despite its empirical success, a tight theoretical understanding of DDPM -- especially its convergence properties -- remains limited. In this paper, we provide a refined convergence analysis of the DDPM sampler and establish near-optimal convergence rates under general distributional assumptions. Specifically, we introduce a relaxed smoothness condition parameterized by a constant $L$, which is small for many practical distributions (e.g., Gaussian mixture models). We prove that the DDPM sampler with accurate score estimates achieves a convergence rate of $$\widetilde{O}\left(\frac{d\min\{d,L^2\}}{T^2}\right)~\text{in Kullback-Leibler divergence},$$ where $d$ is the data dimension, $T$ is the number of iterations, and $\widetilde{O}$ hides polylogarithmic factors in $T$. This result substantially improves upon the best-known $d^2/T^2$ rate when $L < \sqrt{d}$. By establishing a matching lower bound, we show that our convergence analysis is tight for a wide array of target distributions. Moreover, it reveals that DDPM and DDIM share the same dependence on $d$, raising an interesting question of why DDIM often appears empirically faster.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes