LGAINov 12, 2025

Break the Tie: Learning Cluster-Customized Category Relationships for Categorical Data Clustering

arXiv:2511.09049v12 citationsh-index: 11
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the challenge of clustering categorical data in real-world datasets, which is an incremental improvement over existing distance metric methods.

The paper tackles the problem of clustering categorical data by learning customized distance metrics that adapt to varying cluster structures, resulting in significantly superior clustering accuracy with an average ranking of 1.25 compared to 5.21 for the best existing method.

Categorical attributes with qualitative values are ubiquitous in cluster analysis of real datasets. Unlike the Euclidean distance of numerical attributes, the categorical attributes lack well-defined relationships of their possible values (also called categories interchangeably), which hampers the exploration of compact categorical data clusters. Although most attempts are made for developing appropriate distance metrics, they typically assume a fixed topological relationship between categories when learning distance metrics, which limits their adaptability to varying cluster structures and often leads to suboptimal clustering performance. This paper, therefore, breaks the intrinsic relationship tie of attribute categories and learns customized distance metrics suitable for flexibly and accurately revealing various cluster distributions. As a result, the fitting ability of the clustering algorithm is significantly enhanced, benefiting from the learnable category relationships. Moreover, the learned category relationships are proved to be Euclidean distance metric-compatible, enabling a seamless extension to mixed datasets that include both numerical and categorical attributes. Comparative experiments on 12 real benchmark datasets with significance tests show the superior clustering accuracy of the proposed method with an average ranking of 1.25, which is significantly higher than the 5.21 ranking of the current best-performing method.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes