LeMat-GenBench: A Unified Evaluation Framework for Crystal Generative Models
This provides a reproducible framework for comparing generative models in materials science, addressing a key bottleneck for researchers in the field, though it is incremental as it focuses on evaluation rather than new model development.
The authors tackled the lack of standardized evaluation for generative models of crystalline materials by introducing LeMat-GenBench, a unified benchmark with metrics, and found that increased stability in models correlates with decreased novelty and diversity, with no model performing well across all dimensions.
Generative machine learning (ML) models hold great promise for accelerating materials discovery through the inverse design of inorganic crystals, enabling an unprecedented exploration of chemical space. Yet, the lack of standardized evaluation frameworks makes it challenging to evaluate, compare, and further develop these ML models meaningfully. In this work, we introduce LeMat-GenBench, a unified benchmark for generative models of crystalline materials, supported by a set of evaluation metrics designed to better inform model development and downstream applications. We release both an open-source evaluation suite and a public leaderboard on Hugging Face, and benchmark 12 recent generative models. Results reveal that an increase in stability leads to a decrease in novelty and diversity on average, with no model excelling across all dimensions. Altogether, LeMat-GenBench establishes a reproducible and extensible foundation for fair model comparison and aims to guide the development of more reliable, discovery-oriented generative models for crystalline materials.