DSMar 10

On the Online Weighted Non-Crossing Matching Problem

arXiv:2603.09262v145.7h-index: 28
Predicted impact top 22% in DS · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses a combinatorial optimization problem in computational geometry with applications in areas like resource allocation, but it is incremental as it builds on prior work on the unweighted version.

The paper tackles the online weighted non-crossing matching problem in the Euclidean plane, showing that deterministic algorithms cannot achieve a non-trivial competitive ratio, but randomization allows for a constant competitive ratio for arbitrary weights, with bounds provided for variants like revocability and collinear points.

We introduce and study the weighted version of an online matching problem in the Euclidean plane with non-crossing constraints: points with non-negative weights arrive online, and an algorithm can match an arriving point to one of the unmatched previously arrived points. In the classic model, the decision on how to match (if at all) a newly arriving point is irrevocable. The goal is to maximize the total weight of matched points under the constraint that straight-line segments corresponding to the edges of the matching do not intersect. The unweighted version of the problem was introduced in the offline setting by Atallah in 1985, and this problem became a subject of study in the online setting with and without advice in several recent papers. We observe that deterministic online algorithms cannot guarantee a non-trivial competitive ratio for the weighted problem, but we give upper and lower bounds on the problem with bounded weights. In contrast to the deterministic case, we show that using randomization, a constant competitive ratio is possible for arbitrary weights. We also study other variants of the problem, including revocability and collinear points, both of which permit non-trivial online algorithms, and we give upper and lower bounds for the attainable competitive ratios. Finally, we prove an advice complexity bound for obtaining optimality, improving the best known bound.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes