NISPMar 22

WirelessBench: A Tolerance-Aware LLM Agent Benchmark for Wireless Network Intelligence

arXiv:2603.2125183.41 citationsh-index: 6
Predicted impact top 1% in NI · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the problem of reliably deploying LLM agents for autonomous wireless network management, though it is incremental as it builds on existing benchmarking concepts with domain-specific enhancements.

The paper tackles the lack of benchmarks for LLM agents in wireless network management that reflect real engineering risks, and presents WirelessBench, a tolerance-aware benchmark that reveals catastrophic errors and enables fine-grained diagnosis, showing a 16.64 percentage point performance gap between direct-prompting and tool-integrated agents.

LLM agents are emerging as a key enabler for autonomous wireless network management. Reliably deploying them, however, demands benchmarks that reflect real engineering risk. Existing wireless benchmarks evaluate single isolated capabilities and treat all errors uniformly, missing both cascaded-chain failures and catastrophic unit confusions (\textit{e.g.}, dB vs.\ dBm). We present \wb{}, the first tolerance-aware, tool-integrated benchmark for LLM-based wireless agents. \wb{} is organized as a three-tier cognitive hierarchy: domain knowledge reasoning (WCHW, 1{,}392 items), intent-driven resource allocation (WCNS, 1{,}000 items), and proactive multi-step decisions under mobility (WCMSA, 1{,}000 items). Moreover, \wb{} is established on three design principles: \emph{(i)}~tolerance-aware scoring with catastrophic-error detection; \emph{(ii)}~tool-necessary tasks requiring a 3GPP-compliant ray-tracing query for channel quality; and \emph{(iii)}~Chain-of-Thought (CoT)-traceable items, where every benchmark item ships with a complete CoT trajectory enabling fine-grained diagnosis of where in the reasoning chain an agent fails. Our numerical results show that the direct-prompting model (GPT-4o) scores $68\%$, trailing a tool-integrated agent ($84.64\%$) by $16.64$\,pp; $23\%$ of errors are catastrophic failures invisible to exact-match metrics. More importantly, the hierarchy decomposes errors into four actionable diagnostic categories that flat evaluation cannot reveal. Code and data: https://wirelessbench.github.io/.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes