From Physician Expertise to Clinical Agents: Preserving, Standardizing, and Scaling Physicians' Medical Expertise with Lightweight LLM
This addresses the scarcity and slow transmission of expert medical knowledge, particularly in Traditional Chinese Medicine, though it is incremental as it builds on existing LLM methods.
The paper tackles the problem of scaling high-quality clinical expertise by proposing Med-Shicheng, a framework that uses large language models to learn and transfer physicians' diagnostic and therapeutic knowledge, achieving performance comparable to advanced models like DeepSeek-R1 and GPT-5 on resource-constrained GPUs.
Medicine is an empirical discipline refined through long-term observation and the messy, high-variance reality of clinical practice. Physicians build diagnostic and therapeutic competence through repeated cycles of application, reflection, and improvement, forming individualized methodologies. Yet outcomes vary widely, and master physicians' knowledge systems are slow to develop and hard to transmit at scale, contributing to the scarcity of high-quality clinical expertise. To address this, we propose Med-Shicheng, a general framework that enables large language models to systematically learn and transfer distinguished physicians' diagnostic-and-therapeutic philosophy and case-dependent adaptation rules in a standardized way. Built on Tianyi, Med-Shicheng consists of five stages. We target five National Masters of Chinese Medicine or distinguished TCM physicians, curate multi-source materials, and train a single model to internalize all five knowledge systems across seven tasks, including etiology-pathogenesis analysis, syndrome diagnosis, treatment principle selection, prescription generation, prescription explanation, symptom evolution with regimen adjustment, and clinical advice. Implemented on Qwen2.5-1.5B-Base, Med-Shicheng runs on resource-constrained GPUs while achieving performance comparable to DeepSeek-R1 and GPT-5. We also examine the reliability of LLM-as-a-judge versus physician evaluation: automated judging tracks overall trends but shows bias on fine-grained individualized distinctions, highlighting the need for physician involvement when ground truth is unavailable and for domain-adapted judge models.