XR is XR: Rethinking MR and XR as Neutral Umbrella Terms
This work addresses terminology confusion in the XR field, which is incremental as it clarifies existing usage without introducing new methods or data.
This paper tackles the lack of consensus on the term XR by analyzing its historical formation and spread, concluding that XR functions as a neutral umbrella term for VR, AR, and MR rather than an abbreviation for Extended Reality.
The term XR is currently widely used as an expression encompassing Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), and Mixed Reality (MR). However, there is no clear consensus regarding its origin or meaning. XR is sometimes explained as an abbreviation for Extended Reality, but multiple interpretations exist regarding its etymology and formation process. This paper organizes the historical formation of terminology related to VR, AR, MR, and XR, and reexamines the context in which the term XR emerged and how it has spread. In particular, by presenting a timeline that distinguishes between the coinage of terms and the drivers of their adoption, we suggest that XR, as an umbrella term, functions not as an abbreviation of Extended Reality, but rather as a neutral symbolic label that encompasses multiple "reality"-related terms. Furthermore, we argue that stable usage of terminology, including XR, requires governance through collaboration among academia, industry, and standardization organizations.