AICLLGApr 17

Learning to Reason with Insight for Informal Theorem Proving

arXiv:2604.1627886.0h-index: 7
Predicted impact top 23% in AI · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

For LLM-based theorem proving, this work addresses the bottleneck of recognizing core techniques, enabling more effective mathematical reasoning.

The paper identifies lack of insight as a bottleneck in informal theorem proving with LLMs and proposes DeepInsightTheorem, a hierarchical dataset with core techniques and proof sketches, plus a Progressive Multi-Stage SFT strategy. Experiments show significant improvement over baselines on challenging math benchmarks.

Although most of the automated theorem-proving approaches depend on formal proof systems, informal theorem proving can align better with large language models' (LLMs) strength in natural language processing. In this work, we identify a primary bottleneck in informal theorem proving as a lack of insight, namely the difficulty of recognizing the core techniques required to solve complex problems. To address this, we propose a novel framework designed to cultivate this essential reasoning skill and enable LLMs to perform insightful reasoning. We propose $\mathtt{DeepInsightTheorem}$, a hierarchical dataset that structures informal proofs by explicitly extracting core techniques and proof sketches alongside the final proof. To fully exploit this dataset, we design a Progressive Multi-Stage SFT strategy that mimics the human learning process, guiding the model from basic proof writing to insightful thinking. Our experiments on challenging mathematical benchmarks demonstrate that this insight-aware generation strategy significantly outperforms baselines. These results demonstrate that teaching models to identify and apply core techniques can substantially improve their mathematical reasoning.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes