ITITMLApr 20

Bayesian experimental design: grouped geometric pooled posterior via ensemble Kalman methods

arXiv:2604.1850574.41 citationsh-index: 3
AI Analysis

This work addresses the accuracy-efficiency trade-off in Bayesian experimental design for complex physical systems, offering a practical improvement over existing amortized methods.

Bayesian experimental design for complex physical systems is often computationally expensive due to nested inference. The authors propose a grouped geometric pooled posterior framework with ensemble Kalman inversion that improves accuracy while maintaining computational cost comparable to amortized methods, demonstrated on Gaussian-linear and high-dimensional network-based problems.

Bayesian experimental design (BED) for complex physical systems is often limited by the nested inference required to estimate the expected information gain (EIG) or its gradients. Each outer sample induces a different posterior, creating a large and heterogeneous set of inference targets. Existing methods have to sacrifice either accuracy or efficiency: they either perform per-outer-sample posterior inference, which yields higher fidelity but at prohibitive computational cost, or amortize the inner inference across all outer samples for computational reuse, at the risk of degraded accuracy under posterior heterogeneity. To improve accuracy and maintain cost at the amortized level, we propose a grouped geometric pooled posterior framework that partitions outer samples into groups and constructs a pooled proposal for each group. While such grouping strategy would normally require generating separate proposal samples for different groups, our tailored ensemble Kalman inversion (EKI) formulation generates these samples without extra forward-model evaluation cost. We also introduce a conservative diagnostic to assess importance-sampling quality to guide grouping. This grouping strategy improves within-group proposal-target alignment, yielding more accurate and stable estimators while keeping the cost comparable to amortized approaches. We evaluate the performance of our method on both Gaussian-linear and high-dimensional network-based model discrepancy calibration problems.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes