Maritime Connectivity Vulnerability Index: Construction, Patterns, and Validation Across 185 Economies, 2006-2025
Provides a novel supply-side vulnerability metric for maritime economies, filling a gap in existing connectivity indicators.
The paper introduces the Maritime Connectivity Vulnerability Index (MCVI) to quantify structural vulnerability in liner shipping networks across 185 economies from 2006-2025. SIDS show 0.234 higher vulnerability than non-SIDS, with the gap widening over time; the index predicts trade losses during COVID-19 (rho = -0.25, p < 0.005) and correlates with logistics performance (rho = -0.61).
Recent disruptions at major maritime chokepoints have exposed the structural fragility of liner shipping networks. Existing indicators measure connectivity, but none quantify its structural vulnerability from a supply-side perspective. We propose the Maritime Connectivity Vulnerability Index (MCVI), capturing three dimensions mapped to distinct UNCTAD sources: low overall connectivity (LSCI), weak bilateral integration (LSBCI), and port infrastructure concentration (PLSCI). The index covers 185 economies over 2006-2025 using pooled fractional rank normalization and equal-weight aggregation from publicly available data. SIDS exhibit a mean vulnerability 0.234 points above non-SIDS economies, with the gap widening from 0.232 to 0.249 over two decades. A modest global decline of 4.2% is observed. Port concentration dominates for nearly 40% of economies (72 of 185), establishing infrastructure diversification as a distinct policy priority. Rankings are highly stable across alternative weighting schemes, normalization methods (Spearman rho = 0.97-0.999), and PCA-derived weights; Monte Carlo simulation (1,000 replications) confirms rho > 0.95 in every realization. External validation shows strong negative correlation with the World Bank Logistics Performance Index (rho = -0.61 across seven waves) and positive correlation with ad valorem maritime freight rates (rho = +0.32). Panel regressions reveal a vulnerability paradox whereby small trade-dependent economies are simultaneously the most trade-open and the most vulnerable. Pre-crisis MCVI predicts trade losses during the COVID-19 supply shock (rho = -0.25, p < 0.005), while the contrasting positive correlation during the 2008-2009 demand shock (rho = +0.23, p = 0.01) validates the supply-side specificity of the index.